SARS 'rogue unit' case revived

  • 📰 eNCA
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 45 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan is facing yet another legal battle dating back to his days at SARS.

But this time the minister's legal team is accusingPravin Gordhan subpoenaed again over SARS 'rogue unit'

Gordhan's attorney Tebogo Malatji is accusing Mkhwebane's investigating team of not cooperating and withholding new information which may have arisen from EFF Deputy President Floyd Shivambu's complaint. The minister's legal team also argues that since the matter dates back ten years -- when he was SARS Commissioner -- there should be new conditions or evidence to warrant a fresh investigation.

To put a spanner in the works in this impasse, Mkhwebane's office says it suspects there may be collusion in answers provided by current SARS employees, who have been subpoenaed.Oupa Segalwe claims a meeting was held at the revenue service's offices but can't confirm or deny whether Gordhan was present.Mkhwebane has since issued a scathing statement against the minister, after granting him an extension to file his supporting documents.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

I once engage someone,I tell him that,no one is above the law of this country. Pravin can duck and dive as much as he like,his day is coming. Slowly but surely the net is closing on him.Pravin must account.

vat hom ! Mkwebane . pravingordhan

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 49. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Pravin Gordhan fires off legal demand for proof after 'untrue' collusion claim'We take serious issue with any suggestion by the Public Protector that there was collusion by implicated parties who were served with subpoenas to coordinate how our client responds to her office'.
Source: SowetanLIVE - 🏆 13. / 63 Read more »