Justices give presidents immunity for official acts, further delaying Trump’s trial

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 43 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The justices said unofficial acts have no immunity, sending Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 case back to the D.C. judge to decide which alleged acts are official.

Former President Donald Trump at Manhattan criminal court before his conviction in May for falsifying business records related to a hush money payment. Former presidents are immune from prosecution for official actions taken while in the White House, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday, but do not have immunity for unofficial acts.

The justices sent the case back to the lower court to determine which acts alleged in the indictment are official. That makes it highly unlikely that the 45th president will go to trial on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election before voters cast ballots in this year’s presidential contest, in which Trump is the presumptive Republican nominee.

There were not many cases from history for the justices to turn to for guidance to resolve the competing claims in. Forty years ago, in a case involving President Richard M. Nixon, the Supreme Court said the Constitution shields presidents from private civil lawsuits for actions taken as part of their official duties — even those at the “outer perimeter” of their responsibilities.That decision aimed to ensure the threat of civil litigation did not distract from a president’s duties.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court justices accepting gifts hurts concept of fairness, says former Donald Trump attorneyEx-Trump attorney Tim Parlatore on Friday said the Supreme Court justices' acceptance of gifts 'degrades the image of impartiality' following details of lavish gifts in their latest financial disclosures.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

EDITORIAL: Establishment Supreme Court justices ally with liberals against free speechFor a court that's supposedly 'far right,' the Supreme Court continues producing decisions that frustrate anyone trying to advance the partisanship narrative.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

The justices toss yet another precedent, delighting conservativesThe court overturns the 40-year-old bias for regulatory power, thrilling the right.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Justices grill attorneys as correspondence school case reaches Alaska Supreme CourtUnless the Supreme Court acts sooner, the lower court’s ruling invalidating the homeschool statutes takes effect July 1.
Source: KTOOpubmedia - 🏆 439. / 53 Read more »

Yes, there is a federal recusal law for Supreme Court justicesHere are the top stories around San Diego County for the morning of Thursday, May 9th. For the latest news, weather and sports, head to: https://www.cbs8.com/
Source: CBS8 - 🏆 335. / 59 Read more »