, and about 350 others, but legal experts say that only a subset of those defendants will see changes in their court cases.
The Supreme Court did not assess the merits of Fischer’s charge, but rather, it sent the matter back to the lower courts, where prosecutors must now convince a judge that Fischer violated the obstruction law in its newly narrowed form if they want the charge to stay intact. Defendants who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to the obstruction charge and already served out their sentence, such as Jacob Chansley, better known as the “QAnon Shaman,” have little recourse.
Shipley said there are still some unknowns about how parties in the Jan. 6 cases will proceed and how judges in the lower courts will respond to the Supreme Court’s decision, and he emphasized that, in practice, the decision was not a “huge win” for the defendants. Legal analysts at Just Security conceded that Friday’s decision dealt a “soft blow” to the government. They, however, that “very few cases are likely to be materially affected” and that Trump’s case would be “materially unaffected.”
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: cbschicago - 🏆 546. / 51 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »