Supreme Court opioid case makes it harder to shield wealth in bankruptcy

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 80 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 35%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court’s ruling that the fortunes of Sackler family members could not be shielded in the bankruptcy of their opioid company Purdue Pharma shuts the door on an increasingly common strategy in corporate boardrooms.

Protesters, including photographer and activist Nan Goldin, center right, staged a die-in on Aug. 9, 2021, outside the courthouse in White Plains, N.Y., where the Purdue Pharma bankruptcy was taking place. Companies seeking protection from lawsuits by filing for bankruptcy must now reckon with a Supreme Court ruling against the opioid company Purdue Pharma that substantially raised the bar for executives and owners trying to shield their wealth, legal analysts said.

opioid-maker, offered plaintiffs about $6 billion of the $11 billion they extracted from the company. In exchange, family members would have received immunity from future lawsuits, without filing forthrew the massive bankruptcy case against Purdue Pharma into doubt after years of court battles over the company’s role in the nation’s opioid epidemic.

Notably, the Supreme Court’s opinion on Purdue pointed to an exception in federal law involving asbestos cases that allows bankruptcy courts to approve a settlement even if not all claimants agree to it. Erik Haas, Johnson & Johnson’s worldwide vice president of litigation, said in a statement Thursday that the ruling “affirms the viability and validity” of the company’s bankruptcy plan, citing the exception for asbestos cases.

Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, writing in dissent, warned that the decision “deprives the bankruptcy system of a longstanding and critical tool that has been used repeatedly to ensure fair and sizable recovery for victims — to repeat, recovery forThe majority’s ruling scrambled the usual conservative-liberal divide, with four of the court’s conservative justices — Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett — taking a position that has been popular among liberal lawmakers.

It could also impact the Boy Scouts of America, which agreed to pay $2.5 billion to settle claims of sexual abuse in bankruptcy court, a deal that shields from future litigation insurance companies as well as schools, churches and community organizations involved with the nonprofit.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court knocks down Wall Street regulator’s in-house courtsThe justices backed a challenge to the constitutionality of the SEC’s internal tribunals — a resounding win for conservatives.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court courts sides with Starbucks in blow to union activistsExperts say the decision could make it harder for the National Labor Relations Board to obtain relief when companies are accused of violating labor law.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court sides with Starbucks, makes it harder for NLRB to win court ordersThe justices tightened the standards for when a federal court should issue an order to protect the jobs of workers during a union organizing campaign.
Source: komonews - 🏆 272. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court reverses lower court ruling that state’s correspondence statutes are unconstitutionalThe Alaska Supreme Court has unanimously reversed a Superior Court ruling that had struck down Alaska’s correspondence school statutes as unconstitutional, restoring the program as it has existed for the last ten years.
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »

Iowa’s Supreme Court tells lower court to let strict abortion law go into effectThe Iowa Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling that blocked the state’s strict abortion law, and is telling the lower court to let the law take effect.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Iowa’s Supreme Court tells lower court to let strict abortion law go into effectThe 4-3 ruling is a win for Republican lawmakers.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »