Supreme Court just made it harder for federal agencies to regulate in sweeping ruling

  • 📰 KTOOpubmedia
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 52 sec. here
  • 5 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 34%
  • Publisher: 53%

Federal Government News

NPR News,Chevron V. The Natural Resources Defense Council,U.S. Supreme Court

The decision overturned Chevron v. The Natural Resources Defense Council, a 1984 decision that was not particularly controversial when it was announced 40 years ago.

The U.S. Supreme Court made it far more difficult for federal agencies to issue rules and regulations that carry out broad mandates enacted by Congress.

The idea was that when Congress enacts broad regulatory mandates, agencies fill in the gaps, using their expertise to carry out what are reasonably deemed to be Congress’ intent. But, in an important caveat, Roberts noted that the decision does “not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework. The holdings of those cases that specific agency actions are lawful–including the Clean Air Act holding of Chevron itself–are still subject to statutory stare decisis despite our change in interpretive methodology.”

That argument, however, didn’t carry the day at the Supreme Court. The conservative supermajority, and its long time opposition to Chevron deference, carried the day instead. As Justice Brett Kavanaugh observed during oral argument in the case deferring to agency interpretations “ushers in shocks to the system every four or eight years when a new administration comes in” and implements “massive change” in areas like securities law, environmental law, and communications law.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 439. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court continues power grab by overturning Chevron precedentThis week, the Supreme Court heard two cases that have the potential to upend our government function as we know it. If the Supreme Court overturns the 40-year-old doctrine known as Chevron deference, it would drastically shrink the power of federal agencies to regulate much of anything at all.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Sierra Club Condemns U.S. Supreme Court Decision to Overturn Fundamental Precedent in ChevronNewswire Editor is a Common Dreams staff position.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

'Gift to Corporate Greed': Dire Warnings as Supreme Court Scraps Chevron DoctrineJake Johnson is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

What it means for the Supreme Court to throw out Chevron decision, undercutting federal regulatorsBy MATTHEW DALY WASHINGTON (AP) — Executive branch agencies will likely have more difficulty regulating the environment, public health, workplace safety and other issues under a far-reaching …
Source: denverpost - 🏆 13. / 72 Read more »

Chevron Doctrine overturned: Republicans, big business praise Supreme Court decisionThe Supreme Court ruling overturned the case known as Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, reducing the authority of federal regulatory agencies.
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »

Chevron Doctrine overturned: Republicans, big business praise Supreme Court decisionThe Supreme Court ruling overturned the case known as Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, reducing the authority of federal regulatory agencies.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »