The Supreme Court on Friday ruled in favor of a former Pennsylvania police officer charged for his alleged participation in the U.S. Capitol attack, saying a felony obstruction charge was improperly applied in his case.The Supreme Court on Friday ruled in favor of a former Pennsylvania police officer charged for his alleged participation in the U.S. Capitol attack, saying a felony obstruction charge was improperly applied in his case.
At issue was whether a 2002 law enacted in the wake of the Enron scandal to prevent the destruction of evidence in financial crimes could be used against alleged participants in the Trump mob attack on the U.S. Capitol of Jan. 6, 2021, which disrupted congressional certification of electoral votes from the 2020 presidential election.
To prove a violation of the law at hand, the court said "the Government must establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects." "The Court does not dispute that Congress's joint session qualifies as an 'official proceeding'; that rioters delayed the proceeding; or even that Fischer's alleged conduct was part of a successful effort to forcibly halt the certification of the election results," Barrett wrote.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: abc7newsbayarea - 🏆 529. / 51 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »