Supreme Court's Right-Wing Majority Delivers Gift to Corporate Criminals

  • 📰 commondreams
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 10 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 40%
  • Publisher: 51%

Corporate Crime News

Corporate Power,National Labor Relations Board,Public Citizen

Jake Johnson is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled along ideological lines that the Securities and Exchange Commission cannot use in-house legal proceedings to civilly penalize fraudsters, a decision that could strike a devastating blow to federal agencies' ability to fight corporate crime. In the 6-3 decision, the high court's conservative supermajority deemed the SEC's in-house proceedings unconstitutional, siding with the U.S.

' 'Today's decision is another step in the long-term corporate project of neutering federal agencies' ability to protect the public from fraudsters, rip-offs, dangerous products, carbon polluters, and more,' Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, said in a statement. 'The decision will have near-term consequences for the financial system, as it hinders the SEC's ability to seek critical penalties.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 530. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

The Most Ridiculous, Right-Wing Supreme Court That Dark Money Could BuyThe high court, with its conservative supermajority, is in your body, working to elect Trump, and in-your-face corrupt. No one is going to stop them.
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »

Feldman: Supreme Court’s far right faces a free-speech problemIn trademark case, hard-line conservatives invoke ‘history and tradition’ while other side proposes a clear, simple rule.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

Here’s the landscape 2 years after the Supreme Court overturned a national right to abortionJudges, state lawmakers and voters are deciding the future of abortion in the U.S. two years after the Supreme Court jolted the legal status quo with a ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »

Here’s the landscape two years after the Supreme Court overturned a national right to abortionTwo years after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the debate over abortion access is playing out in elections and the courts.
Source: PhillyInquirer - 🏆 81. / 68 Read more »

Here’s the landscape 2 years after the Supreme Court overturned a national right to abortionTwo years after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the debate over abortion access is playing out in elections and the courts.
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »

Here’s the landscape 2 years after the Supreme Court overturned a national right to abortionTwo years after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the debate over abortion access is playing out in elections and the courts.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »