Supreme Court Dismisses Social Media Censorship Case for Lack of Standing, Alito Issues Blistering Dissent

WASHINGTON, DC – Social media companies like Facebook are free to continue censoring conservatives according to a divided Supreme Court, over a vigorous conservative dissent.

“Though the platforms restricted the plaintiffs’ content, the plaintiffs maintain that the Federal Government was behind it,” Barrett explained. “Acting on that belief, the plaintiffs sued dozens of Executive Branch officials and agencies, alleging that they pressured the platforms to censor the plaintiffs’ speech in violation of the First Amendment.”

The majority held that the plaintiffs failed to show they had suffered legal injuries that were traceable to Facebook and the company formerly called Twitter, that resulted from Biden administration coercion, and that a court could fix by issuing an order. “Victims of the campaign perceived by the lower courts brought this action to ensure that the Government did not continue to coerce social media platforms to suppress speech,” Alito began. “All these victims simply wanted to speak out on a question of the utmost public importance.”

“Some was undoubtedly untrue or misleading, and some may have been downright dangerous,” Alito noted. “But we now know that valuable speech was also suppressed. That is what inevitably happens when entry to the marketplace of ideas is restricted.” And because of the perpetrators’ high positions, it was even more dangerous. It was blatantly unconstitutional, and the country may come to regret the Court’s failure to say so. Officials who read today’s decision together withwill get the message. If a coercive campaign is carried out with enough sophistication, it may get by. That is not a message this Court should send.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court dismisses Republican suit claiming Biden officials censored social mediaCasting aside claims that conservatives are censored, Supreme Court dismisses lawsuit from Republican state attorneys.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Emergency Abortions Remain Legal—For Now—As Supreme Court Dismisses CaseAlison Durkee is a senior reporter covering breaking news, with a focus on legal issues and U.S. politics. She joined Forbes in 2020 and is based in London and New York, covering such topics as the Supreme Court, litigation against Donald Trump and clashes over abortion rights. Durkee previously covered U.S.
Source: ForbesTech - 🏆 318. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court dismisses case that would have limited abortion pill accessIn a 9-0 ruling, the high court shot down a challenge to the FDA’s approval of mifepristone, allowing the drug to continue to be prescribed online.
Source: sltrib - 🏆 316. / 61 Read more »

Oklahoma Supreme Court dismisses lawsuit of last Tulsa Race Massacre survivors seeking reparationsThe New Black View
Source: NYAmNews - 🏆 269. / 63 Read more »

Oklahoma Supreme Court Dismisses Lawsuit From Tulsa Race Massacre SurvivorsThe survivors had sought financial reparations from the city for its failure to protect Black residents.
Source: truthout - 🏆 69. / 68 Read more »

Oklahoma Supreme Court dismisses Tulsa race massacre survivors' lawsuitClarissa-Jan Lim is a breaking/trending news blogger for MSNBC Digital. She was previously a senior reporter and editor at BuzzFeed News.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »