Abortion ruling leaves pregnant patients, doctors in limbo over high-risk care

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 79 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 35%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court did not settle whether patients nationwide whose health is in jeopardy during pregnancy are entitled to emergency care.

from a Texas hospital with a life-threatening pregnancy complication, the 25-year-old college senior learned about a federal law that could have protected her during the most frightening medical episode of her life.EMTALA, made her feel she had some degree of power, Norris-De La Cruz said: The federal government required doctors and hospitals to provide abortions in emergency situations like hers — even in states where abortion is illegal.

chose not to weigh in on the larger question of whether the four-decade-old EMTALA compels medical providers nationwide to offer abortions when a physician deems it necessary to protect a woman’s health. The Biden administration has repeatedly invoked that position since 2021, as abortion opponents worked to overturnThe case returns to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, where litigation will continue.

Georgia’s six-week abortion ban includes exceptions for medical emergencies and “medically futile” pregnancies — but, Verma said, the implementation ofon what pregnancy conditions doctors can treat, she said, many of her colleagues at other Georgia hospitals mustShe had hoped the Supreme Court would issue a clear and resounding message that doctors are always able to provide stabilizing care in emergencies.

When Sara Thomson, an OB/GYN in Idaho, first heard about the early draft of the decision that went online Wednesday, she had time only to glance at a headline about the ruling. As soon as she saw it, and realized she would again be empowered to provide emergency abortions, she felt an immense sense of relief.Her feelings changed later that day, she said, when she returned to read more about the decision — and realized it was only temporary.

The turmoil has drawn Biden officials and reproductive rights groups to Idaho. The nation’s top health official, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, joined Thomson and other providers Wednesday in Boise, where he vowed to defend access to emergency abortions.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court allows emergency abortion access in Idaho for nowThe decision is a temporary win for the Biden administration.
Source: 6abc - 🏆 250. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court allows emergency abortion access in Idaho for nowThe decision is a temporary win for the Biden administration.
Source: abc7newsbayarea - 🏆 529. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court allows emergency abortion access in Idaho for nowThe decision is a temporary win for the Biden administration.
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court allows emergency abortion access in Idaho for nowThe decision is a temporary win for the Biden administration.
Source: abc13houston - 🏆 255. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court allows emergency abortion access in Idaho for nowThe decision is a temporary win for the Biden administration.
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court allows emergency abortion access in Idaho for nowThe decision is a temporary win for the Biden administration.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »