Tammy Duckworth Demands Justice Department Answers For People With Disabilities

  • 📰 HuffPostCanada
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 47 sec. here
  • 4 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 29%
  • Publisher: 53%

Department Of Justice News

Tammy Duckworth,Americans With Disabilities Act

Shruti Rajkumar is a reporter at HuffPost, covering breaking news, politics, race and disability.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth and other lawmakers are pushing to make it easier for disabled Americans to take action when they believe their rights have been violated.

“When disability rights are violated, those harmed deserve to be heard and should receive the support they need quickly and fairly. While the Department of Justice’s Mediation Program has made progress as a valuable tool to resolve ADA complaints, the DOJ has not regularly shared updates on the program’s performance with Congress or the American people for over a decade — and that has got to change,” Duckworth said in a statement sent to HuffPost.

“When disability rights are violated, those harmed deserve to be heard and should receive the support they need quickly and fairly.”deputy legal director at the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, told HuffPost that she doesn’t know of anyone who has been referred to the mediation program in her 30 years of work, adding that the Justice Department doesn’t accept the majority of complaints from disabled people for investigation or mediation referral.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 61. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Justice Alito Responds Accordingly to Democrat Demands to Recuse Himself From Trump/J6-Related Cases“A reasonable person who is not motivated by political or ideological considerations or a desire to affect the outcome of Supreme Court cases would conclude this event does not meet the applicable standard for recusal.”
Source: LegInsurrection - 🏆 3. / 95 Read more »