Untangling the Supreme Court’s unofficial abortion decision

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 47 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The prematurely published decision says Idaho hospitals may perform emergency abortions to stabilize patients while litigation on the matter continues.

House lawmakers are slated to consider a bevy of health-care proposals. Independent vaccine experts will weigh in on updated coronavirus shots to be used this fall.

The administration contends that EMTALA requires abortions for pregnant women if needed to address health-threatening conditions short of death, such as organ failure or loss of fertility. Conservatives counter that the White House is stretching a law that makes no mention of the procedure so that it can justify abortion access.

Even as a majority of five justices appear to agree that the high court should stay out of the issue for now,Alito said EMTALA does not require hospitals to perform abortions in violation of Idaho’s ban — in part because the federal statute doesn’t specifically mention abortion but does include language directing hospitals to protect an “unborn child” from harm.

. The agency now advises people over the age of 75 to get the shot, as well as anyone age 60 to 74 who is “at increased risk of severe RSV.”, aiming to ensure they better represent the patients who will actually use them.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Can State Supreme Courts Preserve—or Expand—Rights?With a lopsided conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, Eyal Press writes, progressive activists are seeking legal opportunities in state constitutions.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »

Supreme Court courts sides with Starbucks in blow to union activistsExperts say the decision could make it harder for the National Labor Relations Board to obtain relief when companies are accused of violating labor law.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »