Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge Against Biden Admin Pressuring Social Media to Censor Speech

  • 📰 LegInsurrection
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 81 sec. here
  • 6 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 46%
  • Publisher: 95%

1St Amendment News

Biden Administration,Social Media,Us Supreme Court

The majority held that the plaintiffs did not establish Article III standing. The plaintiffs requested 'forward-looking relief.' Therefore, they had to prove they would face 'a real and immediate threat of repeated injury.'

The majority held that the plaintiffs did not establish Article III standing. The plaintiffs requested “forward-looking relief.” Therefore, they had to prove they would face “a real and immediate threat of repeated injury.”

“Putting these requirements together, the plaintiffs must show a substantial risk that, in the near future, at least one platform will restrict the speech of at least one plaintiff in response to the actions of at least one Government defendant,”. “Here, at the preliminary injunction stage, they must show that they are likely to succeed in carrying that burden. On the record in this case, that is a tall order.

But even Hines, with her superior showing on past harm, has not shown enough to demonstrate likely future harm at the hands of these defendants. On this record, it appears that the frequent, intense communications that took place in 2021 between the Government defendants and the platforms had considerably subsided by 2022, when Hines filed suit. Thus it is “no more than conjecture” to assume that Hines will be subject to Government-induced content moderation.

If a President dislikes a particular newspaper, he lacks the ability to put the paper out of business. But for Facebook and many other social media platforms, the situation is fundamentally different. They are critically dependent on the protection provided by §230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U. S. C. §230, which shields them from civil liability for content they spread.

SCOTUS has affirmed and reaffirmed for 60 years that “Government may not coerce or intimidate a third-party intermediary into suppressing someone else’s speech.”Haven’t read the opinions or the filings, but this is a shockingly bad outcome. Kavanaugh, Barrett and Roberts joined the crazies for this.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 3. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Oklahoma Supreme Court dismisses lawsuit of last Tulsa Race Massacre survivors seeking reparationsOKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — The Oklahoma Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit of the last two survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, dampening the hope of advocates for racial justice that the government would make amends for one of the worst
Source: PGCitizen - 🏆 65. / 51 Read more »

Oklahoma Supreme Court Dismisses Lawsuit Of Last Tulsa Race Massacre Survivors Seeking ReparationsThe Oklahoma Supreme Court has dismissed a lawsuit of the last two survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre who were seeking reparations.
Source: HuffPostCanada - 🏆 61. / 53 Read more »

Oklahoma Supreme Court dismisses lawsuit of last Tulsa Race Massacre survivors seeking reparationsThe Oklahoma Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit of the last two survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, dampening the hope of advocates for racial justice that the government would make amends for one of the worst single acts of violen
Source: PGCitizen - 🏆 65. / 51 Read more »

Oklahoma Supreme Court dismisses lawsuit of last Tulsa Race Massacre survivors seeking reparationsThe Oklahoma Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit of the last two survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, dampening the hope of advocates for racial justice that the government would make amends for one of the worst single acts of violen
Source: BurnabyNOW_News - 🏆 14. / 77 Read more »

Oklahoma Supreme Court dismisses lawsuit of last Tulsa Race Massacre survivors seeking reparationsThe Oklahoma Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit of the last two survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, dampening the hope of advocates for racial justice that the government would make amends for one of the worst single acts of violen
Source: SooToday - 🏆 8. / 85 Read more »

Quebec court alarmed public by improperly using term 'secret trial,' Supreme Court rulesThe Supreme Court of Canada is seen in a file photo from June 2023.
Source: CBC - 🏆 32. / 63 Read more »