on Wednesday found that the state of Missouri did not have standing to challenge the Biden administration’s alleged coercion and efforts to encourage censorship on social media.
The 6-3 majority opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett found that the plaintiffs, which included individuals and the state of Missouri, lacked standing to bring the case.and Louisiana and five other plaintiffs bringing a lawsuit against the Biden administration over its involvement in social media companies’ censorship practices.
A federal judge in Louisiana ruled against the Biden administration, saying in a lengthy memorandum ruling that the case “depicts an almost dystopian scenario” where the government “seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth.
The judge issued a preliminary injunction that prohibited some government agencies from communicating with social media companies about content moderation, and the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals partially upheld the ruling.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
U.S. Supreme Court sides with Texas woman who claims she was arrested out of political retributionSylvia Gonzalez alleged the city of Castle Hills had arrested her on a minor charge in retaliation for criticizing the city manager.
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court sides with Texas woman who claims she was arrested out of political retributionSylvia Gonzalez alleged the city of Castle Hills had arrested her on a minor charge in retaliation for criticizing the city manager.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court sides with former Castle Hills official who says her arrest was politicalSylvia Gonzalez alleged the city of Castle Hills had arrested her on a minor charge in retaliation for criticizing the city manager.
Source: SAReport - 🏆 252. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court sides with Biden administration in social media dispute with GOP-led statesThe justices in a 6-3 vote threw out lower-court rulings that favored Louisiana, Missouri and other parties in their claims that officials in the Democratic administration leaned on social media platforms to unconstitutionally squelch conservative points of view.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court sides with Starbucks, makes it harder for NLRB to win court ordersThe justices tightened the standards for when a federal court should issue an order to protect the jobs of workers during a union organizing campaign.
Source: komonews - 🏆 272. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court strikes down Trump-era ban on rapid-fire rifle bump stocks, reopening political fightThe Supreme Court has struck down a Trump-era ban on bump stocks, a rapid-fire gun accessory that was used in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history. The high court Friday found the Tru…
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »