Gun safety and domestic violence prevention organizations hold a rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court as oral arguments are heard in the case ofThe Supreme Court on Friday upheld a federal law that prevents someone under a domestic violence restraining order from possessing firearms in the case ofphysically assaulted his girlfriend in a parking lot in Texas and then told her that if she talked to the police about it, he would shoot her.
Under a 1994 federal law, anyone with an active domestic violence restraining order against them is barred from possessing or purchasing firearms. Rahimi wasthat any restriction on firearms must be “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition” — meaning that it must have a point of reference rooted in the time of the Constitution’s signing.
“Our country has stood at a tipping point, with the safety of survivors of domestic violence on the line. But today, we took a step toward protecting millions from their abusers,” said Janet Carter, senior director of issues and appeals at Everytown Law, in a statement after the decision. “This is a major victory for gun safety in the courts, but make no mistake — we should not have been here in the first place.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: abc7newsbayarea - 🏆 529. / 51 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »