The tragedy of the Supreme Court’s bump stock ruling

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 40 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Don’t let technicalities, or a refusal to use common sense, become the enemy of public safety.

A cross remains at a memorial site in front of the Mandalay Hotel for 58 shooting victims in Las Vegas on Nov. 15, 2017. Father’s Day 2024 took on a somber note for me this year in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ ban on bump stocks. The ruling was deliveredthat Newtown, Conn.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. admits that the Las Vegas mass shooting in 2017 “demonstrated that a semiautomatic rifle with a bump stock can have the same lethal effect as a machinegun,” and there is a “need” to ban bump stocks, yet concurs with Justice Clarence Thomas that such a gun is not a machine gun because “forward pressure” is required to keep firing.

But no one should believe the conservative justices’ claim that dictionaries made them do it. The majority not only ignored the potential consequences of its decision; it ignored what the text and history of the law Congress passed require as well., the key terms in the current statutory definition of “machinegun” — “automatically” and “by a single function of the trigger” — were passed into law in 1934.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court courts sides with Starbucks in blow to union activistsExperts say the decision could make it harder for the National Labor Relations Board to obtain relief when companies are accused of violating labor law.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Can State Supreme Courts Preserve—or Expand—Rights?With a lopsided conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, Eyal Press writes, progressive activists are seeking legal opportunities in state constitutions.
Source: NewYorker - 🏆 90. / 67 Read more »

US courts to handle Coinbase Dogecoin sweepstakes disputesThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled that district courts, not arbitrators, have jurisdiction over disputes involving Coinbase’s Dogecoin sweepstakes.
Source: Cointelegraph - 🏆 562. / 51 Read more »