A DA kept Black women off a jury. California’s Supreme Court says that wasn’t racial bias

  • 📰 AP
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 51 sec. here
  • 18 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 80%
  • Publisher: 51%

California News

Juries,Legal Proceedings,Courts

One by one, a California prosecutor eliminated five out of six Black women from the jury pool for a death penalty case in which a white carpet cleaner slayed his client, a young mother.

The attorney in Alameda County had a reason for each dismissal. He believed one, for instance, appeared too reluctant to impose a death sentence. Another had a “liberal bent.” After the defense struck the last Black woman, the jury proceeded with no Black members even though Black people made up close to 15% of Alameda County’s population at the time.for allegedly striking Black and Jewish people from juries around the time of Nadey’s sentencing.

Their 5-2 decision highlights the complexities of recent moves in court and in the Legislature to address racial bias in capital cases. Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2019 declared a, writing in his executive order that “death sentences are unevenly and unfairly applied to people of color, people with mental disabilities, and people who cannot afford costly legal representation.”suggesting prosecutors for years excluded potential Black and Jewish jurors based on their identity. That was the root of U.S.

The prosecutors used loaded language during the trial, calling Nadey a “tattooed pervert” and a “tattooed predator.” The Supreme Court ruling acknowledged the prosecutor made some errors in the trial, but it found they did not merit a reversal of the jury’s decision. Today, Nadey is 58 and serving time at a state prison in Vacaville.In a dissent, two justices wrote that the court should have paid more attention to Nadey’s argument that Black women were improperly removed from the jury pool.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 728. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

The Great Society, the black family, and the Supreme Court'Man in the house' rules didn't destroy the black family. The marriage penalties embedded in Great Society programs did.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Today in History: June 13, Johnson nominates Marshall to become first Black Supreme Court justice1865: Poet William Butler Yeats is born in Dublin 1971: NY Times begins publishing Pentagon Papers 2023: Trump pleads not guilty in classified docs case
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court 'Black Hole of Indifference' Sparks FrustrationSenator Sheldon Whitehouse raised concerns about Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Biden tells Black voters he will put progressives on Supreme Court in second termPresident Biden has promised to nominate progressives to the United States Supreme Court if he wins a second term in office in the November election.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

South Carolina's Supreme Court will soon have no Black justicesAll the justices on South Carolina’s Supreme Court are going to be white for the first time in nearly two decades. Circuit Judge Jocelyn Newman was the lone Black candidate for the state Supreme Court seat coming open. The only African American on the high court is Chief Justice Don Beatty.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

South Carolina's Supreme Court will soon have no Black justicesAll the justices on South Carolina’s Supreme Court are going to be white for the first time in nearly two decades
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »