The Supreme Court ruled in a six-to-three opinion against a drug mule fighting conviction by claiming expert testimony from a Homeland Security Investigations special agent violated federal evidentiary rules.
Diaz claimed Flood’s testimony violated federal evidentiary rules, claiming he was stating an opinion about her mental state or condition. The court allowed Flood to testify that most couriers are aware they are transporting large amounts of drugs in similar cases. In this case, Agent Flood did not express an opinion about whether Diaz herself knowingly transported methamphetamine. Instead, he testified about the knowledge of most drug couriers.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
The Supreme Court's ruling on mifepristone isn't the last word on the abortion pillThe Supreme Court has decided to uphold federal approval of the abortion pill mifepristone, for now.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »
The Supreme Court's ruling on mifepristone isn't the last word on the abortion pillThe Supreme Court has decided to uphold federal approval of the abortion pill mifepristone, for now.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
The Supreme Court's ruling on mifepristone isn't the last word on the abortion pillThe Supreme Court has decided to uphold federal approval of the abortion pill mifepristone, for now.
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
Canada says it could offer access to mifepristone if the abortion drug is banned in the USThe Supreme Court is deciding whether or not to uphold a ban issued in Texas.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court OKs shift of Black voters to shore up GOP congressional districtSupreme Court's conservatives uphold a state's right to engage in partisan gerrymandering.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Measure to restrict tax increases cannot appear on November ballot, California Supreme Court rulesA California ballot measure that would have required voter approval for any future state tax hikes will not appear on November ballots, the California Supreme Court ruled.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »