iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/nx-s1-5006107/nx-s1-9c7df0cc-3935-4dbe-9638-6e76537a7ed9" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
Machine guns have been effectively banned for most people since the 1930s, but there have been doubts about whether that ban applies to attachments that can make legal guns shoot as fast as a machine gun. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives determines that, and over the years the agency went back and forth over whether to ban bump stocks.
What the court said today is that's a big enough difference that the ATF was wrong to call a bump stock a"machine gun" as defined by the law. Probably not directly because it's so narrowly focused on the mechanics of bump stocks, so it wouldn't apply to, for instance, Glock switches, which are a different kind of illegal device that allows a handgun to shoot like an automatic, according to Adam Skaggs, chief counsel with Giffords Law, a gun safety group. He is, however, worried about the Supreme Court's broader approach here.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: komonews - 🏆 272. / 63 Read more »
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »
Source: 13WHAM - 🏆 256. / 63 Read more »
Source: abc13houston - 🏆 255. / 63 Read more »
Source: AllSidesNow - 🏆 572. / 51 Read more »