Many Ivy League admissions offices reinstated SAT requirements, even though doing so will make it harder to evade stricter Supreme Court scrutiny of racial preferences. MIT, and the rest of the Ivy League will likely come trailing behind. Harvard also announced it would no longer be taking positions on matters outside the core functions of the university,It's amazing to watch such an abrupt volte-face.
Members of academic communities are now supposed to maintain an elaborate false consciousness. They must insist that affirmative action was the only thing keeping the ivory tower from reverting to its lily-white antecedents but deny that any individual student or faculty member ever benefited from it. They should support admitting students with weaker academic qualifications but professors can befor saying, among other things, that biological sex was real and binary .
All this comes at a heavy cost, both internally, as it becomes harder to do good work in any area where it’s dangerous to find the wrong answer, and externally, as the public loses trust in the entire enterprise. It is good for our elite institutions, and for us, that they are trying to pull themselves back from the brink. A strong society requires strong truth-seeking institutions — and strong truth-telling ones, too.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »
Source: 13WHAM - 🏆 256. / 63 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: WGAL - 🏆 331. / 59 Read more »