Beyoncé performs onstage during the"RENAISSANCE WORLD TOUR" at GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium on Oct. 1, 2023 in Kansas City, Missouri.In a yearly report required by federal ethics laws, Justice Jackson listed her various investments, as well as a nearly $1 million book advance she received from Penguin Random House for herBut the most notable item was under gifts, where the justice listed “Concert Tickets ,” valued at $3,711. The source of those tickets? “Beyonce Knowles-Carter.
Members of the federal judiciary are not barred from owning investments, earning outside income or even accepting gifts like expensive concert tickets. But they must disclose such income to avoid any potential conflicts of interest involving cases that they’re tasked with deciding. When faced with a financial conflict of interest — or even the appearance of such bias — lower federal judges are required to recuse themselves from cases. In a new code of conduct issued last year after the Thomas-Crow uproar, the high court agreed to follow essentially those same rules. But those new regulations noted that recusals are harder at the Supreme Court, where a justice cannot simply be replaced by another judge.
In the case of Justice Jackson, such questions would only arise if Beyoncé had business before the high court — an outcome that’s not impossible, given the rash of copyright litigation in the music industry, but seems unlikely any time soon.Watch Kelly Clarkson Go Down in a ‘Blaze of Glory’ as She Botches the Lyrics in Front of Bon Jovi. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »