In the fourth, the principal reason was that decision letters did “not make a clear finding of dishonesty”.
This fish rots from the head down.
Priorities are to party donors and tax dodgers
And yet they (the Government) appear to be inexplicitly much less discriminating when presented with the lies and illegalities of the Leave campaign
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
How Home Office used terror law on highly skilled migrantsHundreds of people who worked and lived in UK for years were told they had 14 days to leave Another goodie from the paper happy to help bring down our once stable government. I really despise what our country has become over the past decade. I never thought I would end up feeling this way, but I do now. Now he has Incontinentia Rees-Mogg on his team he’ll be unstoppable
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »
Court castigates Home Office over misuse of immigration lawDamning verdict says use of terrorism-related rule to refuse applications is legally flawed A court will punish Home Office for contempt on the preservative and not on the vindictive principle. Ministers must b held liable, they would have provided overall direction of how policy and rules should be enforced. Meh... PeteDavidson did it better. SNL
Source: The Guardian - 🏆 84. / 53 Read more »