Guantanamo military tribunal hit with another legal setback

  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 50 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The tribunals were created after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to prosecute detainees at the military prison.

A federal appeals court dealt another severe blow to the beleaguered Guantanamo Bay military tribunals Tuesday, tossing out three years worth of rulings in a key terror case after deciding the judge overseeing the proceedings did not appear to be impartial.

The case is being handled under Guantanamo Bay’s military commissions, created after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to prosecute detainees at the military prison. Tuesday’s ruling is yet another setback for the tribunal system. The order included an extraordinary rebuke of military judges, prosecutors and other officials for failing to ensure that the commission process remained free of bias and the appearance of bias.

“In no proceeding is the need for an impartial judge more acute than one that may end in death,” Tatel wrote in an opinion joined by Judges Judith Rogers and Thomas Griffith. Tatel said the court recognized that the ruling would lead to further delays in a process already faulted for its glacial pace, but added that upholding the legitimacy of the process had to take precedence over speed.

The Justice Department declined to comment, citing the pending litigation. The Defense Department had no immediate comment on the ruling.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Federal courts continue to accrue power making themselves more powerful than the Executive and military.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 381. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

New concerns Trump administration may be laying legal groundwork for military action against IranCongress and some legal experts are concerned the Trump administration is laying the legal groundwork for war with Iran by increasingly connecting the country to al Qaeda It’s actually quite disorienting when rand paul makes sense. How many more Americans have to die fighting israel’s wars. Enough!! But he's not worth impeachment?
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

No legal way to release immigrants into 'sanctuary cities': Democrat Bennie ThompsonThe chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee said that he didn't see a legal way for the administration to implement a proposal to release undocumented immigrants into “sanctuary cities.' Simple put them on a bus and drop them at the courthous of the sanctuary cities. Yet, they'll do it...because they can. They DARE TheDemocrats to do anything about it. Ball is in your park Dems. Democrats are all for illegals until they have to live around them.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

The 8 Most Expensive Legal Mistakes Entrepreneurs MakeLearn the most expensive legal mistakes small business owners and entrepreneurs make and how you can avoid them. Astounded with the manner she divulged all the information... Subtle tone and pace made it a Must Read!!! Huge Respect ✊ Laura E. Cowan Hmm..
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Sudan's new military ruler vows to 'uproot' Bashir regime'I announce the restructuring of state institutions according to the law and pledge to fight corruption and uproot the regime and its symbols.' General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan said. Sudan's main protest group says it will keep up the street demonstrations to achieve its aims that include immediate handover of power to a civilian transitional government
Source: trtworld - 🏆 101. / 63 Read more »

In the age of legal marijuana, many employers drop ‘zero tolerance’ drug testsSince California legalized recreational marijuana, employers are having a hard time finding workers who can pass drug tests required for jobs. Many are loosening their rules. As OWNER OF COMPANY = Some jobs I would be cool with people smoking on the JOB compared to some I would not want them to... EX: if employee wants to LIGHT up a JOINT after lunch before he goes back to mowing a lawn for 2 hours or what have you... similar to tobacco. gasoline MarkStevenOsbo1 It's like having long hair in the past. 'And the sign says, the long-haired freaky people need not apply.' Evolution is a wonderful thing. fivemanelectricband tesla Who could've seen this coming
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »