from the immunity case involving felon and former president Donald Trump, the justice’s reply did not, in one respect, surprise his critics.
“When confronted with this story, Justice Alito ran to a notoriously corrupt infotainment network to construct his alibi. He then testified to a version of events that turns out to be wildly inaccurate,” Jonathan V. Last, editor of the Bulwark,in the New York Times) underscores the perils of unchecked judicial authority, not constrained by term limits or adequate ethical rules. suggests a recusal demand directed at both Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas, whose wife, Virginia,“The U.S.
A second, more practical approach, would be an immediate Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Both of the Alitos could be called to testify under oath. Expert witnesses on judicial ethics could explain the damage to the court resulting from an egregious refusal to recuse when obviously warranted. To date, the committee’s chairman, Durbin, has, to put it mildly, not grasped the importance of focusing public opinion and generating support for court reform.
The Republican-run House would not take up the bill even if Senate Republicans agreed to a vote. There again, a campaign focused on a dysfunctional GOP House majority unable to govern itself and unwilling to hold the court to the same ethics rules that govern other judges would have much to recommend it.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »