After the Christchurch massacre, New Zealand bans semi-automatic rifles

New Zealand’s gun-control laws have failed in parliament four times over the past 20 years. That was before a white supremacist laid siege to two mosques in the city of Christchurch on March 15th, killing 50 people. This week a bill to ban the kind of high-powered semi-automatic weapons that he used was introduced; everyNew Zealand has one of the world’s highest rates of gun ownership, with 26 guns per 100 people.

Firearm-related suicides and homicides fell after the legislation passed. But firearm deaths had already been falling before 1996, and the pace did not notably accelerate. Moreover, gun violence was declining in many other rich countries, few of which had adopted stricter gun laws. . Between 1980 and 1996 there were 13 incidents in which five or more victims were shot to death. There has been just one since. But until Christchurch, New Zealand had not seen any mass shootings in over 20 years, despite the many semi-automatic rifles.

This suggests that social norms have been New Zealand’s best defence against mass shootings. But as Philip Alpers of the University of Sydney notes, the killer in Christchurch would simply not have been able to buy such deadly weapons in his home country, Australia.

So there is one incident and The NZ government goes off into the deep end.

So given its not happened on 20 years is an acceptable casualty frequency? The question should be why does anyone want or need a firearm of ANY description in New Zealand?

Exactly. The issue is not the law abiding citizen, it’s the one who doesn’t care about laws. Anyone want to wager whether criminals in NZ did NOT comply with the law and still hold guns?

I thought maybe you were having an intelligent thought for a moment. Then you said this: 'A similar law in Australia largely eliminated mass killings'

One day I visited a restaurant. I dined full plate curry. After one and half hour I vomited the shit due to indigestion. From that day I stopped eating curry. Gun-control is like stopping to eat curry. This would weaken ordinary citizens' security.

Why were they being sold in the first place?!

US has no significant reasons to not the same. Gun makers will lost money but who cares about gin makers if the price is human lives

So what you're saying is, guns don't cause violence. Forcing opposing cultures to share the same space causes violence.

So terrorism worked in stripping people of their rights.

This is because of radical Islam..all over the world Muslims are fleeing their failed states ..Islam has failed them their culture not condusive to a modern world ..a disaster now the west must pick up the pieces of this failure ..feed them clothe them enough

Why would any civilised society allow anyone but the police & the military to have such weapons? Sheer stupidity.

they drafted those laws SOOOO very quickly. It was incredible really

If someone REALLY wants to kill lots of people they will simply make a bomb and have it go off in a busy place. The gun is not the main issue. The issue is the pen for it is far mightier than the sword.

Machine sans Mindset would be Idle & Mindset sans Machine is ineffective! So Let's All Save Fruit Seeds &Grow Fruit Trees Everywhere Literally &Figuratively Along with School Kids to Sensitize Genext & Grow Globally 46 Billion Fruit Trees/Yr SEQUESTER NOURISH ENRICH ENLIGHTEN.!!

Sounds like the secret criminal society move in.

Why he is supremacist; not terrorist?

I wander journalism that is based upon sensationalism and crude exaggeration?

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

New Zealand Parliament votes to ban semi-automatic weapons after Christchurch mass shootings“I could not fathom how weapons that could cause such destruction and large-scale death could be obtained legally in this country,” said Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern. The number of anti Trump and Fake News stories by this rag is laughable. So when people start using knives, bats, cars, etc. Will those b banned also? A killer will kill with whatever they can It took a mass murder for NZ to ban those weapons of mass destruction. Again, reactive instead of pro-active.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

New Zealand passes law banning most semiautomatic weapons, less than a month after mosque massacresLawmakers in New Zealand voted almost unanimously for a bill that would ban most semiautomatic weapons after 50 were fatally shot in two Christchurch attacks. Regrettable. Australia did the same thing decades ago after a white male massacred a bunch of people in a cafe in Port Arthur. What happened to the “well regulated militia” clause of our 2nd amendment anyway ? Most.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

New Zealand votes to amend gun laws after Christchurch attackLawmakers in New Zealand voted almost unanimously on Wednesday to change gun law... logical Votes to rob its citizens of their god-given rights, they mean In the U.S., people killed in gun violence are just 'collateral damage' for gun profits.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

New Zealand passes gun reform laws in wake of Christchurch terror attackLawmakers voted on the first substantial changes to New Zealand's gun laws in decades, reforms which will ban the use and circulation of semi-automatics. The bill must now receive royal assent from the governor general to become law.
Source: trtworld - 🏆 101. / 63 Read more »