Julian Assange found guilty of breaching bail by British court

A judge in London has found WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange guilty of breaching his bail at Westminster Magistrates' Court.He sought asylum at the London embassy for seven years, fearing US extraditionJudge Michael Snow quickly issued his verdict on Thursday after Assange appeared in the courtroom where his supporters packed the public gallery.

Assange said he was not guilty of failing to surrender to court in 2012, and his lawyer said Assange would not give evidence."His assertion that he has had not had a fair hearing is laughable. And his behaviour is that of a narcissist who cannot get past his own self-interest," Justice Snow said.Assange faced sexual assault allegations in Sweden when he sought asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London 2012, fearing extradition to the US.

that Elisabeth Massi Fritz, a lawyer representing one of Assange's accusers, has submitted a request to the Swedish prosecutor's office to resume the case's preliminary investigation. Assange faces a sentence of up to 12 months for the British conviction, and has been remanded in custody to await sentencing at Southwark Crown Court.

Sign the Petition to Free Julian Assange. Julian Assange is a journalist that published evidence that revealed systemic government corruption and war crimes . He has a 100% accuracy in journalism and is a multi award winning journalist. Sign

Which is risible

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Extensive 'spying operation' discovered against Julian Assange, WikiLeaks revealsThe resulting trove of audio, video, photographs and even copies of private legal documents and a medical exam turned up in Spain, where a group threatened to start publishing them if WikiLeaks did not pay them three million euros. NickdMiller Wikleaks lost any credibility when it tied itself to Putin & became a dirt file unit for Trump & other authoritarians jaraparilla NickdMiller Almost the whole truth. Some glaring omissions of facts eg INA Papers weren't published by WikiLeaks; JA hasn't had phone/internet access for a year so he couldn't possibly hack Moreno's phone etc; Sweden did interview JA and subsequently closed the case due to lack of evidence.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »