Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch seem to imply wanting to hear future cases regarding how civil forfeiture cases are assessed.On Thursday, the Court's 6-3 decision in Culley v. Marshall found that civil forfeiture cases involving personal property require a timely but not a separate preliminary hearing. Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued the opinion.
'They conclude: 'In asking the questions I do today, I do not profess a comprehensive list, let alone any firm answers. Nor does the way the parties have chosen to litigate this case give cause to supply them.'But in future cases, with the benefit of full briefing, I hope we might begin the task of assessing how well the profound changes in civil forfeiture practices we have witnessed in recent decades comport with the Constitution's enduring guarantee that 'o person shall .
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Gorsuch steers Supreme Court in Trump immunity case: ‘We’re writing a rule for the ages’Neil Gorsuch took control of the debate at the Supreme Court in a case where Donald Trump is asking whether he has full immunity from criminal prosecution.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Clarence Thomas Faces Backlash Over Jan. 6 Case Comments: 'What a Disgrace'The Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday in a case relating to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot following the 2020 presidential election.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Laurence Tribe makes a good case against the Supreme Court’s performance in Trump’s caseThe Supreme Court is losing its “legitimacy” thus heading down a path where its rulings will not be accepted by the American people.
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »
How a Jan. 6 case at the Supreme Court could affect Trump’s election interference caseJordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,' a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MSNBC, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »