Justices signaled during a hearing that a decision could wait until after the election while debating the measure’s scope.
An attorney for Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democratic leaders argued during Wednesday’s hearing that the court must move swiftly to prevent wide-ranging disruption if voters approve the measure. Judges signaled openness to waiting to make a decision until after the election, as urged by the ballot measure’s supporters, but also pressed them on the potentially sweeping scope.
The measure’s opponents warn it would undermine public services, create massive uncertainty for local budgets and prevent governments from responding nimbly to crises. Newsom and leading Democrats have also made a more sweeping argument: that the initiative would fundamentally and unlawfully change how California is governed by stripping elected officials of their authority to raise revenue.
“What is the significance of the Legislature having this power as opposed to sharing this power with the electorate?” Justice Goodwin Liu said. “Why would that be such a major transformation?”
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »
Source: abc15 - 🏆 263. / 63 Read more »
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Justices in Trump Case Lean Toward Some ImmunityConservative U.S. Supreme Court justices signaled sympathy for the argument that presidents have some immunity from criminal charges for certain actions taken in office as it heard arguments over Donald Trump's claim of immunity from prosecution for trying to undo his 2020...
Source: NEWSMAX - 🏆 16. / 71 Read more »
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »