FILE - The sun flares in the camera lens as it rises behind the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, June 25, 2017. The Supreme Court will hear an appeal from a Vista, Calif.
“I’m going to be putting together a list of judges — great judges — a list of about 20. I think it’s important to reveal who your. “There are people who say the list helped me win the election last time. Frankly, I think Biden should be doing the same thing.”’s idea is great, except that it creates inner tension because it calls for “great” prospects, but also seeks a list of about 20. The problem is there aren’t 20 great prospects.
The answer is not to create a list of 20, but to create only a list of great prospects — whether that results in one name or 20 names.prospects: First, establish an objective written standard for measuring prospects. Second, evaluate prospects according to that standard. Third, publish a list with only those prospects.prospects.
The Center for Judicial Renewal has researched 11 policy areas under this standard, and it truly separates the wheat from the chaff.When it comes to selecting Justices who will serve on the High Court for a generation, there is no substitute for research and written evaluations. In the past, too many presidents have relied on personal endorsements. For example, John Sununu famously told President George H.W. Bush that David Souter would be a “home run” on the Court.
and director of the Center for Judicial Renewal. He is an expert in constitutional law, judicial policy, and non-profit coalition building. He worked in the judicial branch as a law clerk and also served in the executive branch as an assistant legal advisor. Phillip was an organizer for the Judeo-Christian Council for Constitutional Restoration Inc., which was dedicated to stopping judicial supremacy for the next generation.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »