“During the Supreme Court’s immunity arguments, a majority of the Supreme Court seemed more concerned with the future what-ifs than the here and now. Is there anything that constrains them to confine themselves to the question before them? If they cannot do that in this case, we stand to lose our right to hear Trump’s other trials before the 2024 election.” — Lori G., Kansas City, Missouri Hi Lori, The only thing constraining the Supreme Court is the late Justice William Brennan’s “rule of five.
As Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch said at the hearing, they are writing a rule “for the ages.” Of course, the court doesn’t always do that. Recall Bush v. Gore, which tipped the 2000 election to the Republican. The court stressed there: “Our consideration is limited to the present circumstances, for the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many complexities.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Why the Supreme Court Is Unlikely to Agree With Trump's Immunity ClaimThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this Thursday on the issue of whether former President Donald Trump can be criminally prosecuted for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020...
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Why the Supreme Court Can't Solve All of Donald Trump's Legal ProblemsThe Supreme Court could side with Trump and hand him a major legal win, but his trial in Manhattan could continue to be an issue.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Why two Arizona Supreme Court justices face removal campaign over abortion rulingManuelita Beck is a journalist with nearly two decades of experience in digital transformation, editing, and multimedia production.
Source: abc15 - 🏆 263. / 63 Read more »
Why one California retiree’s Supreme Court win is a victory for property rights nationwideCalifornia retiree George Sheetz has spent more than seven years locked in a long-running legal dispute with his local county over exorbitant permitting fees.
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »
Special counsel urges Supreme Court to reject Trump immunity claim“The Framers never endorsed criminal immunity for a former President, and all Presidents from the Founding to the modern era have known that after leaving office they faced potential criminal liabi…
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Special counsel Jack Smith urges Supreme Court to reject Trump’s claim of immunitySpecial counsel Jack Smith urged the Supreme Court on Monday to reject Donald Trump’s claims of sweeping immunity and to deny the former president any opportunity to delay a trial on charges that he attempted to subvert the results of the 2020 election.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »