A LAWYER alleged to have helped exclude two siblings from their millionaire father-in-law's will admitted his recollection of events from before their father's death was "possibly" wrong.Charlie Bond and wife Katie Atkinson-Bond, who told the High Court she had no concerns about her millionaire father-in-law’s mental capacityMr Bond gave much of his fortune away before he died, but handed nearly all of his remaining £12.3m to Charlie, 43, and Graham, 51.
In response, Ms Reed referred to an "entry on November, when I think you accept that you met Geraldine and it says: 'attending: Duncan at Walker Crips to discuss Reg's will.'" Ms Reed added: "One thing that comes out through your evidence is that you were perfectly content to act on Charlie's instructions without actually worrying about whether these were Reg's intentions."
Ms Reed asked Mr Rann whether this "point of examination" referred to the fact that Mr Bond had gone into hospital the day before. Mr Rann replied: "I think what I'm trying to say that I didn't discuss the will after the 8 November."Mr Rann replied: "I understand what you're saying, but once again you're trying to twist the reality of the situation.Ms Reed then brought up a note Mr Rann had to send to a person called Jed saying: "Thanks Jed, that's perfect, we obviously thought about this issue beforehand and I'm happy it covers everything we need.