. The presidential race went unmentioned but was not far from mind. The Supreme Court heard more than 2 1/2 hours worth of arguments on the landmark question of whether former President Donald Trump is immune from prosecution in a case charging him with plotting to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Though the justices appeared likely to reject Trump's absolute immunity claim, it seemed possible he could still benefit from a lengthy trial delay, possibly beyond November’s election.
There was no reference in the arguments to “November.” Nor to “2024.” Even Trump's name was barely uttered, and mostly in the context of the formal title of court cases. Yet there's no question that the 2024 election was the proverbial elephant in the room, and in that sense, the words not spoken were almost as loud as those that were.
Sure, the justices pressed the lawyers about the actual acts in the indictment, wanting to know which of the steps Trump took in his failed but frantic bid to remain in power might deserve legal protection. But there were plenty of hypothetical scenarios, too, which is hardly surprising given how the justices and courts enjoy testing the outer boundaries of lawyers' arguments as they determine where to draw a line. Trump lawyer D.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Source: postlocal - 🏆 327. / 59 Read more »