Supreme Court takes up Donald Trump's claim of 'absolute immunity' from criminal prosecution

  • 📰 ABC7
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 86 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 38%
  • Publisher: 68%

Supreme Court Takes Up Donald Trump's Claim Of 'Ab News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court is taking up former President Donald Trump's bid to avoid prosecution over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether a former president can be criminally prosecuted for his efforts to stay in power after the 2020 election.On the left and right, Supreme Court justices seem to agree on a basic truth about the American system of government: No one is above the law, not even the president.

But former President Donald Trump and his legal team are putting that foundational belief to the test on Thursday when the high court takes up the Republican's bid to avoid prosecution over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.Trump's lawyers argue that former presidents are entitled to absolute immunity for their official acts.

The election interference conspiracy case brought by special counsel Jack Smith in Washington is just one of four criminal cases confronting Trump, the first former president to face prosecution. He already is standing trial in New York on charges that he falsified business records to keep damaging information from voters when he directed payments to a former porn star to keep quiet her claims that they had a sexual encounter.

Justice Clarence Thomas, who would have prevented the enforcement of the subpoena because of Trump's responsibilities as president, still rejected Trump's claim of absolute immunity and pointed to the text of the Constitution and how it was understood by the people who ratified it. Phillip Bobbitt, a constitutional scholar at Columbia University's law school, said he worries about the delay, but sees value in a decision that amounts to "a definitive expression by the Supreme Court that we are a government of laws and not of men."

"If it was going to take the case, it should have proceeded faster, because now, it will most likely prevent the trial from being completed before the election. Even Richard Nixon said that the American people deserve to know whether their president is a crook. The Supreme Court seems to disagree," Roosevelt said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 67. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court takes up Donald Trump's claim of 'absolute immunity' from criminal prosecutionAgainst the backdrop of a divisive 2024 presidential campaign, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday will take up the monumental question of whether a former president turned presumptive GOP nominee can be criminally prosecuted for his efforts to stay in power after the last election.
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »

Jack Smith tells Supreme Court to reject Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity: 'Unprecedented'Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to reject former President Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Donald Trump tells Supreme Court framers of Constitution would back his absolute immunity claimFormer President Trump argued in a Supreme Court brief filed Monday that the Constitution's framers would have supported his position that a president can't face criminal prosecution for official acts.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court grapples with obstruction charge for 350 Jan. 6 defendants, including Donald TrumpThe Supreme Court struggled Tuesday with the government's case against 350 Jan. 6 defendants from the 2021 protest at the Capitol, with justices pondering how a law written in the wake of the Enron document-shredding scandal can be applied to those who brought the 2020 election certification to a halt.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Donald Trump's Former Lawyer Backs Jack Smith in Supreme Court FightIndividuals appointed in five different presidential administrations urged the Supreme Court to reject Trump's immunity request.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »