The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday involving policies for handling homeless encampments, and how much power municipalities should have when enforcing anti-camping laws.” the Supreme Court takes a case that originated in Oregon’s Grant Pass in 2018 after several homeless people filed suit in federal court alleging the city meant to banish them from the town. Rulings from both a federal district judge in Medford and the 9th U.S.
Theane Evangelis, a lawyer representing the small southern Oregon city of Grants Pass, told the justices that anti-camping laws are “essential” to prevent the proliferation of unsanitary homeless camps and to ensure safety. She said West Coast cities have...The U.S.
They also asked if the Supreme Court even needed to intervene in this case since Oregon in 2021 adopted its own state law that allowed for “objectively reasonable” time, place and manner limits on sitting, lying or sleeping outside.A majority of the Supreme Court appeared inclined on Monday to uphold a series of local ordinances that allowed a small Oregon city to ban homeless people from sleeping or camping in public spaces.
The justices seemed split along ideological lines in the case, which has sweeping implications for how the country deals with a growing homelessness crisis. In a lengthy and, at times, fiery argument that lasted almost two and a half hours, questioning from the justices reflected the complexity of the homelessness debate. They weighed the status of poverty and...
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »