Suhakam: Hearsay allowed in public inquiries, unlike criminal, civil cases

  • 📰 staronline
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 7 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 6%
  • Publisher: 75%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

KUALA LUMPUR: A public inquiry by the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) is allowed to accept hearsay evidence unlike a criminal or civil case in court, says Suhakam commissioner Datuk Mah Weng Kwai.

KUALA LUMPUR: A public inquiry by the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia is allowed to accept hearsay evidence unlike a criminal or civil case in court, says Suhakam commissioner Datuk Mah Weng Kwai .

He said that under Section 14 of the Suhakam Act, the inquiry panel was not limited or constrained by the Evidence Act 1950.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 4. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Hearsay admissible in public inquiries, says Suhakam | The Malaysian InsightPanel is not bound by same standards of evidence as a court of law, says rights commissioner.
Source: msianinsight - 🏆 8. / 63 Read more »

Hearsay evidence permissible in Suhakam inquiry, says commissioner | Malay MailKUALA LUMPUR, April 4 — The Malaysian Human Rights Commission (Sukaham) is permitted to accept hearsay evidence in a public inquiry, a Suhakam commissioner Datuk Mah Weng Kwai said. He said Suhakam inquiries are not bound by the Evidence Act 1950, such as in criminal and civil cases. “It is... Suhakam need 2b more realistic & not play 2 d gallery on such a serious matter. 'Hearsay' & point finger at a specific offender. That's a little bit far-fetched. Sure, Suhakam can do whatever they like. But the point Tun was making was that for the government to act, there has to be more proof than just hearsay.
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »