Supreme Court exposes Biden’s selective prosecution of political opponents

  • 📰 dcexaminer
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 51 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 94%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

In oral argument on a Capitol riot case, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Sam Alito exposed the Biden administration's double standards in prosecuting protesters

, should not apply to his actions during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Fischer, who also was charged with assaulting police officers, is hardly a sympathetic figure. His claims that he wasn’t trying to obstruct or “impede” official congressional business, in the ordinary sense of those words, are specious, but Gorsuch and Alito were interested in a point broader than Fischer’s particular circumstances.

“Would a sit-in that disrupts a trial or access to a federal courthouse qualify ?” Gorsuch asked Biden’s solicitor general, Elizabeth Prelogar. “Would a heckler at today’s audience qualify or a heckler at the State of the Union address? Would pulling a fire alarm before a vote qualify for 20 years in federal prison?”

When Prelogar’s attempt to draw distinctions sounded weak and confusing, Gorsuch pressed further. Using the catchphrase favored by liberal news media and others about urban riots, even ones where police were injured, cars were burned, and federal courthouses were significantly damaged, resulting in trial relocations or delays, Gorsuch somewhat mockingly asked why “a… that actually obstructs and impedes an official proceeding for an indefinite period would not be covered.

The point isn’t that the Capitol rioters should avoid all penalties but that the Biden administration is choosing for ideological reasons when and how to apply laws against illicit protests.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 6. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Justice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is absent from the court Monday with no explanation.
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »

Justice Thomas misses Supreme Court session Monday with no explanationSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is absent from the court Monday with no explanation.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »

Former Supreme Court Justice Breyer aims to return as visiting judge on federal appeals courtFormer Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer is planning to serve as a visiting judge on the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston. Breyer, who retired in 2022, expressed his interest in a podcast and the appeals court confirmed his plans.
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »

Montenegro’s Supreme Court sends Do Kwon’s extradition case back to lower courtThe legal tussles in Montenegro’s courts continue as the country’s Supreme Court sends the question of Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon’s extradition back to a high court.
Source: Cointelegraph - 🏆 562. / 51 Read more »

Court Upholds Conviction for Demonstrating Inside Capitol BuildingA federal appeals court rejects a challenge to the conviction of John Nassif for demonstrating inside the Capitol building on January 6, 2021, ruling that the building is not legally a public forum for protest activity.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court skeptical of efforts to restrict access to abortion pillSeveral justices seemed interested in a narrow ruling that would not address the regulatory or safety issues, but would maintain existing access to mifepristone.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »