“We appreciate the Arkansas Supreme Court giving this ruling and hope we can now once and for all solve this case, clear our names and find the person responsible for carrying out these horrendous crimes,” Damien Echols said in a statement.said a judge wrongly denied a request for new genetic testing of crime scene evidence from the killing of three boys nearly 30 years ago.
“We appreciate the giving this ruling and hope we can now once and for all solve this case, clear our names and find the person responsible for carrying out these horrendous crimes,” Echols said in a statement. “This is monumental.”On Thursday, the court reversed the circuit judge's ruling that the state law allowing for additional testing didn't apply because Echols wasn't in custody when he made the request.
Stephen Braga, lead counsel for Echols, said he planned to seek a possible agreement with the local prosecutor on DNA testing and will file a motion before the lower court. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Barbara Webb said the court's decision “obliterates any sense of finality in our criminal justice system.”
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Source: NBCNewsHealth - 🏆 707. / 51 Read more »
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Source: ksatnews - 🏆 442. / 53 Read more »
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »