California Leaders Take Sides In Monumental Supreme Court Case On Homelessness

  • 📰 LAist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 64 sec. here
  • 4 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 51%

Supreme Court News

Homeless Encampments

The U.S. Supreme Court is about to hear a case that will have major implications on homelessness policy in California. Find out where your leaders stand on the issue.

In these challenging times, the need for reliable local reporting has never been greater. Put a value on the impact of our year-round coverage. Help us continue to highlight LA stories, hold the powerful accountable, and amplify community voices. Your support keeps our reporting free for all to use. Stand with us today.If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily morning newsletter, How To LA.

Good questions! The good news is we can actually answer that. Many people and organizations have filed amicus briefs to the Supreme Court for the case, which means they’ve written out their opinion and submitted it in writing to the Justices for them to consider.Read on to find out where many of the most important stakeholders in the homelessness crisis stand on homeless encampments.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals already has ruled in the Grants Pass case, and in a prior case that cities cannot punish someone for camping if that person has no other shelter. Grants Pass has asked the Supreme Court to overturn both prior rulings. Those on this side argue that by restricting the enforcement of anti-camping ordinances, the courts have made it impossible for cities to lessen the harm encampments do to neighborhoods. They also argue the prior rulings — which they want overturned — are confusing and too hard to follow. to enforce rules when it comes to homeless residents, “leading to an explosion of encampments throughout the state of California.”California Republican Reps.

. People with untreated mental illness are 16 times more likely to be killed by law enforcement than those without a mental illness.negatively impacts

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 606. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

California leaders take sides in monumental Supreme Court case on homelessnessThe U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case with major implications on homelessness policy in California. Find out where your leaders stand.
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »

California Supreme Court to hear appeal seeking to overturn new rooftop solar rulesEnvironmental groups say the California Public Utilities Commission made the wrong call on its NEM 3 decision.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

California Supreme Court to hear appeal seeking to overturn new rooftop solar rulesCalifornia Supreme Court to hear appeal seeking to overturn new rooftop solar rules. Environmental groups say the California Public Utilities Commission made the wrong call when it passed its NEM 3 decision
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

California Supreme Court Denies Chula Vista's Request to Review Drone Footage RulingThe California Supreme Court has denied Chula Vista's request to review a lower court ruling that could make the city's Police Department release some of its drone footage to the public.
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Northern California man wins development impact fees case against U.S. Supreme CourtA Northern California man took his case over development impact fees up to the U.S. Supreme Court and won in a unanimous vote after a 7.5-year battle.
Source: KPIXtv - 🏆 443. / 53 Read more »

Builders may challenge California's development 'impact fees,' Supreme Court rulesThe Supreme Court says home builders in California may challenge the fees commonly imposed by cities and counties to pay for new infrastructure.
Source: L.A. Times Health - 🏆 364. / 59 Read more »