Gun rights groups celebrate win as judge rejects California’s ban on high-capacity magazines

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 59 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

As the NRA cheered the forceful ruling, Eric Tirschwell of Everytown for Gun Safety blasted “the dangerous gun lobby view that more lethal firearms will make America safer.”

By Fred Barbash Fred Barbash Law, constitution and courts Email Bio Follow April 1 at 8:14 PM Gun rights advocates are hailing a federal court ruling striking down California’s ban on high-capacity gun magazines as perhaps the broadest and most forceful judicial statement yet of the right to bear arms, an antidote to what they see as treatment of the Second Amendment as a “disfavored right.”

The National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action called it “one of the strongest judicial statements in favor of the Second Amendment to date.” In a statement, the group’s executive director, Chris W. Cox, said it was a “landmark recognition of what courts have too often treated as a disfavored right.”

A magazine, for a handgun or a rifle, is a spring-loaded container that feeds ammunition into the chamber of a semiautomatic weapon with each pull of the trigger. The Sandy Hook Elementary School shooter, for instance, used a rifle with a 30-round magazine, enabling him to fire 154 rounds in less than five minutes. Adam Lanza’s 2012 assault in Newton, Conn., left 28 dead, including 20 young children.

To make that point, Benitez stressed the millions of semiautomatics owned by Americans. It is clearly a weapon of choice, the judge said. The fact that high-capacity magazines may or may not be more “lethal” than bullets in a revolver is not relevant constitutionally, he wrote: “The Second Amendment does not exist to protect the right to bear down pillows and foam baseball bats. It protects guns and every gun is dangerous.”

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

There’s a reason that it’s in our constitution still valid today! Glad the court saw that truth! If we want to stop the radical assaults we see from time to time, we must address the people issues not gun issues! You can’t create laws to stop INANIMATE objects, they do nothing!

Cocaine, Heroin, Crack, Crystal Meth, E's, & LSD are illegal. Has that stopped their illegal distribution and consumption? NO!! Do they fuel immense illegal enterprises? YES!! Are they a constitutional right? No!! Are Guns? YES!!! Discuss.

USA

Trumpian America- -Celebrating civilians rights to own high capacity magazines -SCOTUS finds its ok to torture you while your put to death

👍

A win for death, for mass murder. There is no other interpretation. This will embolden mass shooters. This is just wrong. It's insane.

Take it to a higher court.if the citizens voted for it

Effing insane

If we could just ban fingers, then no one could pull the trigger!

Of course

It’s happening. We can roll back these stupid gun laws bit by bit now. This is what I’ve been waiting for.

“Woohoo we can kill more people”

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Gun shop that sold weapons to New Zealand mosque attacker calls on lawmakers to not punish “law-abiding” gun ownersGun City, the gun shop that sold weapons to the alleged Christchurch shooter, is urging firearms owners to push back against Parliament's gun legislation. Where have I heard that before? Oh, yes, my own country. Law abiding gun owners shud not need large magazine multi fire guns! Punish the ones who use guns and kill people harshly. Make them blind and deaf and then release to live their lives out in society where they will not suffer.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Federal judge strikes down California’s ban on high-capacity gun magazinesA federal judge in San Diego ruled that a state law banning magazines that hold more than 10 bullets was unconstitutional and issued an injunction barring state officials from enforcing it. Only down in Diego County buddy when the law doesn’t save lives change the law—California legislators PLEASE get the job done. Ban the ammo and its gun NOW
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »