Arizona — one of the most important states on the political map — could soon have one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the country, based on a law that was passed before Arizona was a state, all because those same small-government conservatives decided to use government to tell women what they’re permitted to do with their bodies.on Tuesday in favor of an 1864 law banning abortion in all cases, at any stage of pregnancy, except when it’s necessary to save the mother’s life.
But the court decided that the state’s 15-week ban was no longer valid because it was “predicated entirely on the existence of a federal constitutional right to an abortion” — under Roe — that would later be overturned. A states’ rights advocate might argue that different communities will see an issue differently. “The choices folks in San Francisco might make may differ quite a bit from folks in a rural county in Kansas,” as oneThat misses the point. The underlying message in that tweet is that neither group’s choice is wrong. Yet, we would deny a person’s ability to choose for themself — not because the choice itself is wrong, but because their choice of where to live was wrong.
These are nothing more than zombie laws. Dead and buried in the morals of a different time, they’re being resurrected and contorted with pretzel logic by litigants and ultimately justices, who interpret them as if they were written today rather than “as written” ages ago. So please don’t tell me this is a matter of law, or, for that matter, originalism. That’s just a bunch of smoke-filled coffeehouse crap. This is about people imposing their will on others.“Imposing” is too nice a word.
An originalist would agree that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment must be interpreted in light of “the understandings of those who ratified it.” Justice Thomas agreed. That’s what heWhen the 14th Amendment was ratified, the “understanding” was that it prohibited insurrectionists like Jefferson Davis and fellow Confederate adherents from ever holding a federal office, including the presidency, or “any office civil or military under the United States, or under any State.
And once upon a time in Nogales, wearing suspenders would get you fined: up to $500 for women and up to $1,000 for men.) will follow in the footsteps of every other state that has voted to keep abortion legal and shove it up the keister of the selfishly self-righteous.At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: HuffPostCanada - 🏆 61. / 53 Read more »
Source: SaltWire Network - 🏆 45. / 63 Read more »
Source: BNNBloomberg - 🏆 83. / 50 Read more »
Source: YahooFinanceCA - 🏆 47. / 63 Read more »
Source: globeandmail - 🏆 5. / 92 Read more »
Source: CTVNews - 🏆 1. / 99 Read more »