Trump tests limits of gag order with post insulting 2 likely witnesses in criminal trial

FILE - Former President Donald Trump arrives for a press conference at 40 Wall Street after a pre-trial hearing at Manhattan criminal court, March 25, 2024, in New York. Days after a New York judge expanded a gag order on Trump meant to curtail “inflammatory” speech ahead of his upcoming criminal hush money trial, the former president tested its limits by disparaging two key witnesses in the case as liars. FILE - Judge Juan M. Merchan poses in his chambers in New York, Thursday, March 14, 2024.

The gag order also barred Trump from making public statements of any type about jurors, court staff, lawyers in the case or relatives of prosecutors or of the judge. Trump is allowed to make critical comments about the judge himself and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg says Trump’s hush money criminal trial isn’t about politics

Gregory Germain, a professor at Syracuse University College of Law, described the latest post as a “close call” unlikely to result in Trump being held in contempt. “That’s exactly what a gag order doesn’t want you to do before trial when a potential jury could be influenced,” he said.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Trump's trial in New York criminal case delayed by 20 daysA Manhattan judge pushed back former President Donald Trump's trial in his New York criminal case, following a surprise shakeup in the case just 10 days before it had been scheduled to begin. The trial, on felony charges of falsification of business records related to payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels, had been expected to start March 25, but that date has now been scrapped.
Source: CBSNewYork - 🏆 268. / 63 Read more »

New York appeals court scales back bond due in Trump fraud case and sets new deadlineFormer President Donald Trump will not have to obtain a bond of $464 million to appeal the judgment against him in the civil fraud trial, the New York appeals court ruled Monday.
Source: cbschicago - 🏆 546. / 51 Read more »