“It would be pure fiction to suggest that highly classified documents created by members of the intelligence community and military and presented to the President of the United States during his term in office were ’purely private.’ ”Special counsel Jack Smith is pissed.
“The PRA’s distinction between personal and presidential records has no bearing on whether a former President’s possession of documents containing national defense information is authorized under the Espionage Act,”—over Trump’s willful retention of classified documents. The indictment does not question whether the documents were classified or not—the FBI foundliterally labeled “SECRET,” “TOP SECRET,” and “CONFIDENTIAL.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Special counsel Jack Smith urges judge to rule on Presidential Records Act in Trump caseFederal prosecutors aired their frustration with the federal judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's documents trial in Florida, saying her recent order seeking jury instructions leaned on a 'fundamentally flawed legal premise.'
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »
Jack Smith puts Judge Aileen Cannon on noticeTrump critics have long questioned whether the judge could conduct Trump’s classified documents trial fairly. And at a crucial juncture, Smith signals he’s losing patience.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Jack Smith destroys Judge Aileen Cannon’s jury instructions order in Trump’s documents caseJordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,' a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined MSNBC, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »