In November 2023, the High Court handed down a decision which has led to a response centred in fear, a lack of compassion and, troublingly, a disregard for equal treatment before the law.which is remarkable in a number of ways - not least the response it has generated - the High Court effectively set aside the decision of Al-Kateb, which found indefinite detention to be lawful,.
When the Minister for Home Affairs Clare O’Neil announced the proposed legislation, she said of her predecessor Peter Dutton, “The leader of the opposition loves to present himself as a tough guy on borders. He never wrote laws as tough as this. For the first time we criminalise people who do not follow these visa conditions.”Marketing yourself as “tougher” than Dutton, as someone keen to be more punitive than Dutton, more eager to rob people of their liberty than Dutton, is base politics.
, “If you live in Frankston and you’ve got a problem with Victorian women being assaulted by foreign criminals, vote against Labor. If you do not want to see Australian women being assaulted by foreign criminals, vote against Labor. Send Labor a message.” Any veneer that might have covered the Coalition’s reliance on xenophobia was stripped away by those comments and her defence of it in the aftermath. The way this reflects on our politics and our commitment to the rule of law is shameful.Then, last week, the government introduced and attempted to rush through the House The Migration Amendment Bill 2024.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »