29 March 2019
A five-man bench led by Chief Justice Tan Sri Richard Malanjum unanimously dismissed the Bar Council's appeal. “It had not been shown to us that there was a failure by the Disciplinary Board in acting fairly and judicially in carrying out its duty,” he said, adding that the appeal did not have merit. However, the judgment was pronounced today by a four-member bench pursuant to Section 78 of the Courts of Judicature Act as Justice Balia had retired.
The hearing of the complaint against Abraham by the Disciplinary Committee commenced on Feb 27, 2014 and ended on February 7, 2015.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Apex court clears lawyer Cecil Abraham of misconduct | The Malaysian Insight4-judge panel dismisses disciplinary complaint brought by Malaysian Bar in relation to SD prepared for the late PI Bala. Bloody hell !
Source: msianinsight - 🏆 8. / 63 Read more »
Apex court affirms no misconduct by senior lawyer Cecil AbrahimChief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak David Wong Dak Wah says there was also no blatant error in the application of law.
Source: fmtoday - 🏆 5. / 72 Read more »
Federal Court directs Najib’s RM42m trial to start | Malay MailKUALA LUMPUR, March 27 — Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s case over RM42 million belonging to former 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) unit SRC International Sdn Bhd may proceed in the High Court, the Federal Court ruled today. Chief Justice Tan Sri Richard Malanjum, who chaired a seven-man panel at... Time's up. Stand by the orange suit for the YB. Jeng jeng Getting nearer.
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »
Federal Court lifts stay in Najib’s SRC casePUTRAJAYA: The trial of former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s corruption cases involving SRC International Sdn Bhd funds may start soon at the High Court.
Source: staronline - 🏆 4. / 75 Read more »
Federal Court acquits the late Karpal Singh of sedition | The Malaysian InsightFederal Court acquits the late Karpal Singh of sedition
Source: msianinsight - 🏆 8. / 63 Read more »
Federal Court frees late Karpal Singh from sedition chargePUTRAJAYA: Almost five years after his death, the Federal Court acquitted the late Karpal Singh of a sedition charge, for allegedly questioning the la...
Source: theSundaily - 🏆 25. / 51 Read more »
Federal Court posthumously acquits Karpal Singh of sedition (VIDEO) | Malay MailPUTRAJAYA, March 29 — The Federal Court today unanimously acquitted late DAP leader Karpal Singh of sedition after finding a serious miscarriage of justice in his case over a 2009 remark on the Perak crisis then. Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Zaharah Ibrahim, who chaired the Federal Court panel,... Honour him by removing the sedition act instead. saifuddinabd Kasi case kroni menang le...
Source: malaymail - 🏆 1. / 86 Read more »
No more delays, Federal Court orders Najib’s SRC trial to begin | The Malaysian InsightThe apex court has instructed the high court to set trial dates.
Source: msianinsight - 🏆 8. / 63 Read more »
Special court will deal with Agong, not ICC: lawyerHuman rights advocate Edmund Bon dismisses concerns Rome Statute will affect the position of Malay rulers. If you are not the mass murderer responsible for the Wang Kelian mass murder or the MH370 mass murder, why should you be worried about the International Criminal Court? Unless if you say the rome statute obeys the Agong and puts Agong on top, then this is pretty much the same with ICERD. Attempts to take a certain amount of judicial and authority from the hands of malaysian judiciary system. I support Rome Statute. It's right to sign. Gov did the right thing and YDPA have no objection.
Source: malaysiakini - 🏆 20. / 51 Read more »
April 19 hearing for Rosmah's bid to stay case transfer to High CourtThis after High Court judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah allowed the prosecution’s application to transfer the case from the Sessions Court to the High Court.
Source: fmtoday - 🏆 5. / 72 Read more »