Woman hired private investigators to prove husband's adultery, man denies it but fails in court appeal
The district judge granted interim judgments for divorce in favour of both parties' cases. He found the husband had proven his claim, but he also found that the wife had proven her two claims. Justice Choo said the district judge in this case did not specifically say which burden of proof he applied. A similar incident was reported on a Saturday, May 7, 2022, when the pair returned to the mistress' flat in the husband's car at about 9.45pm.
The partner grew suspicious and found messages showing the cheating pair referring to each other in endearing terms.The partner also testified that the mistress had shown him the membership card of a sports complex and said she could swim there. The partner confronted the husband, stopping him at the spot where the mistress was usually dropped off on May 30, 2021.
The partner said there was no shadow of a doubt in his mind that the husband and the mistress were in a serious relationship after this conversation. "The records even show which gantry the husband's car passed, and that was the gantry leading to the co-respondent's flat," said Justice Choo.The husband claimed he had gone there to visit his brother, but the judge said the records did not support this story.