Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court says

  • 📰 AP
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

A federal appeals court says a requirement that cigarette packs and advertising include graphic images demonstrating the effects of smoking does not violate the First Amendment. The ruling Thursday from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was a partial victory for federal regulators seeking to toughen warning labels.

FILE - This image provided by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Thursday, Aug. 15, 2019, shows proposed cigarette warning labels. A federal rule requiring that cigarette packs and advertising include graphic images demonstrating the effects of smoking, including pictures of smoke-damaged lungs and feet blackened by diminished blood flow, does not violate the First Amendment, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday, March 21, 2024.

The 5th Circuit panel rejected industry arguments that the rule violates free speech rights or that it requires images and lettering that take up so much space that they overcome branding and messaging on packages and advertisements. While reversing the lower court’s First Amendment finding, the panel noted that the judge had not ruled on the APA-based challenge. It sent the case back to the district court to consider that issue.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 728. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court saysA federal appeals court says a requirement that cigarette packs and advertising include graphic images demonstrating the effects of smoking does not violate the First Amendment.
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »

Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't breach First Amendment, court saysA federal appeals court says a requirement that cigarette packs and advertising include graphic images demonstrating the effects of smoking does not violate the First Amendment.
Source: wjxt4 - 🏆 246. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court to hear First Amendment challenge to New York's financial 'blacklisting' of NRAThe Supreme Court on Monday will hear arguments in a key First Amendment case brought by the NRA to challenge a government official’s action they say violates the First Amendment.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court weighs NRA First Amendment dispute against New York regulatorThe Supreme Court weighed if a New York official can be sued for violating free speech rights by urging banks and insurers to avoid doing business with the NRA.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Supreme Court Justice Expresses Concerns About First Amendment and Social Media CensorshipU.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raises concerns about the First Amendment limiting the government's ability to regulate speech on social media platforms. She discusses the possibility of encouraging or requiring censorship for public safety.
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »