Both suits are being represented by the extremist Christian organization Alliance Defending Freedom and are part of a concerted effort to undermine abortion access.in June 2022, it claimed to be returning the issue of abortion access back to the states and people’s elected officials. In the majority opinion, Justice Alito“the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.
One case could lead to limits on access to one of the two drugs used for medication abortion, and the other could allow states to ban emergency abortion care to save a patient’s life. Decisions in both cases would have effects nationwide—illustrating the chaos and confusion that theThese cases come at a time when the highest Court’s approval rating is at a near-record low—and while an increasingly large majority supports access to abortion.Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v.
The case was initially filed in a lower court in Texas specifically so that, upon appeal, it would eventually reach Judge Matthew J.
The District Court of Idaho sided with the DOJ and enjoined the law in August 2022, but the plaintiffs—both the state of Idaho and the Idaho legislature, whose challenge has been consolidated into the state’s case—appealed to the Ninth Circuit and asked the U.S. Supreme Court for an emergency review.Although the two cases take two different approaches, their arrival at the U.S. Supreme Court is part of a concerted effort to undermine abortion access in the United States.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »
Source: 6abc - 🏆 250. / 63 Read more »
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Source: ABC7NY - 🏆 592. / 51 Read more »
Source: fox5ny - 🏆 587. / 51 Read more »