Meta, Microsoft, X and Match Group challenge Apple over app store terms

The filing accuses Apple of willfully circumventing the spirit of the original order, which was designed to unlock competition by forcing Apple to let app makers communicate with their users about deals and promotions in specific ways. That order was effectively upheld by the Supreme Court earlier this year when the justices declined to hear the case involving Apple and Epic Games, maker of the hit video game “Fortnite.

In the filing, Meta argued it should be allowed to inform users about ways to pay for “boosted posts” on its platform through means other than Apple’s in-app purchase system. Boosted posts, Meta said, are typically used by small businesses to promote their products on Facebook and Instagram. In February, Meta announced it would be passing along the costs of Apple’s fees, effectively hiking the price of boosted posts by 30%.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Apple's Compliance with Court Order Challenged by Meta, Microsoft, Match Group, and XMeta, Microsoft, Match Group, and X have filed an amicus brief stating that Apple is not complying with a court order regarding app developers' use of external payment options. Apple's proposed solution is deemed complex and burdensome by the companies.
Source: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 Read more »

Apple’s compliance plan in Epic case is insufficient, Meta, Microsoft tell courtIn an amicus brief in Epic v. Apple, Meta, Microsoft, and Match Group say Apple’s compliance plans would not introduce more price competition for app payments.
Source: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 Read more »