U.S. Abortions reach recent high, with record number done via medication

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 59 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The increase comes as the U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to limit access to mifepristone, a key abortion drug.

in the United States rose by 10 percent between 2020 and 2023, while medication abortions became more common than ever, according to aThe Guttmacher Institute found that there were more than 1 million U.S. abortions last year, the first time since 2012 that the tally crossed that threshold. The group alsothat medication abortions made up 63 percent of those performed during that time, or about 642,700 procedures, up from 53 percent in 2020.

The report said the abortion rate for women and girls ages 15 to 44 increased to 15.7 abortions per 1,000 women, up from 14.4 per 1,000 in 2020. Some of the largest increases in abortions were recorded in states that bordered those with the most restrictive antiabortion laws. For example, Illinois, which borders IndianaMore broadly, states without total bans recorded a 25 percent increase in abortions last year relative to 2020.

Wider access to the drugs mifepristone and misoprostol likely contributed to the overall rise, as more providers used virtual appointments to prescribe the abortion medications via mail after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration loosened regulations in recent years for obtaining mifepristone.

Abortion providers and advocates say that if the Supreme Court restricts access to mifepristone, the second drug in the two-drug regimen, misoprostol,in the United States in 2020 after a 30-year decline. It peaked in 1990 at 1.6 million and fell to 885,000 abortions in 2017.Biden administration announced new steps. Oral arguments are likely to be scheduled for the spring, with a decision by the end of June.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Ohio Supreme Court primary with 2 Democrats kicks off long campaign over court's partisan controlThe Democratic primary for one of three contested seats on the Ohio Supreme Court will kick off a high-stakes battle for partisan control of the court this fall
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Ohio Supreme Court primary with 2 Democrats kicks off long campaign over court's partisan controlThe Democratic primary for one of three contested seats on the Ohio Supreme Court will kick off a high-stakes battle for partisan control of the court this fall. The court currently has a 4-3 Republican majority. To flip that, Democrats must sweep the races in November by retaining two incumbents and winning an open seat.
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »

Ohio Supreme Court primary begins as Democrats try to flip court from Republican controlThe Democratic primary for one of Ohio's Supreme Court seats has begun. The state's Supreme Court has a 4-3 Republican majority, but Democrats hope to flip that in their favor.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

WV Supreme Court to issue landmark ruling on whether opioid distribution can cause a public nuisanceA federal appeals court asked the West Virginia Supreme Court whether opioid distribution could cause a public nuisance under state law as WV reviews a lawsuit against drug companies.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court Debates Biden Administration's Coordination with Big Tech in Censorship CaseIn a debate at the Supreme Court, one justice raised concerns about the government's relationship with the First Amendment in a case challenging the Biden administration's alleged coordination with Big Tech to censor certain messages. The case involves a lawsuit brought by Republican-led states Missouri and Louisiana, accusing high-ranking government officials of working with social media companies to censor speech on topics such as Hunter Biden's laptop and COVID-19 origins. The justices debated whether the Biden administration's actions violated the First Amendment and whether its outreach efforts with private companies were permissible persuasion or illegal coercion. Justice Samuel Alito criticized the government for treating social media platforms as subordinates, while Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed concerns about the First Amendment limiting the federal government's actions.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court seems wary of barring government contacts with social mediaAt issue was a sweeping Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that barred government officials from having contacts with social media platforms.
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »