The court ruled in two cases, one of which concerned parents Christopher and Kimberly Garnier, who sued after they were blocked from the social media pages of PUSD trustees Michelle O' Connor-Ratcliff and T. J. Zane. A federal judge previously ruled in favor of the Garniers and an appellate court panel affirmed that ruling.
If an official is found to engage in state action while using their social media page, blocking a user entirely could open them up to liability, she wrote.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court sets rules on when public officials can block social media usersThe Supreme Court laid out a new test for determining when actions taken by government employees on social media constitute official business verses personal conduct.
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court sets rules on when public officials can block social media usersThe First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech, generally prohibits government employees from censoring public comments or blocking access to a social media account that offers official communications.
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court sets rules for public officials who want to block social media criticsIf a public employee has the “actual authority to speak on the state’s behalf” and “purported to exercise that authority” on social media, then the official can be liable for blocking or deleting critical commentators, the opinion said.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »
Live updates: Supreme Court considers the future of social mediaThe Supreme Court on Monday will hear oral arguments in a pair of cases that could transform how social networks have operated for decades.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Watch Live: Supreme Court hears social media cases that could reshape how Americans interact onlineThe two cases concern Republican-backed state laws that aim to restrict social media companies like Facebook and X, formerly Twitter, from moderating content.
Source: CBSNews - 🏆 87. / 68 Read more »
The Supreme Court will hear challenges to Texas and Florida social media lawsThese cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »