Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.
Given the impact of technological advancements in various sectors and industries, it would be short-sighted to advise lawyers to steer clear of exploring tools and AI platforms, as the takeover by these tools in the near future is inevitable. At this stage, however, it is pivotal that lawyers who dare to use ChatGPT do so responsibly, failing which there may be unpleasant consequences.
The representatives of the relevant lawyer argued that the special costs order sought in this matter was in connection with the conduct of the relevant lawyer and issues of conduct fell squarely in the realm of the Law Society. Therefore, the court was not suited to rebuke the conduct by awarding a special cost order in the matter.
In finding that a special cost order was not justified in this matter, the court considered the following factors: the two non-existent cases were already withdrawn at the time of the hearing; even if the said cases had not been withdrawn at the time of the hearing, they would have likely not been used in court, as there were volumes of other legal sources relied upon by the parties; the opposing party’s legal team was well-resourced, e.g.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: City_Press - 🏆 7. / 72 Read more »
Source: News24 - 🏆 4. / 80 Read more »
Source: SABCNews - 🏆 37. / 51 Read more »
Source: ewnreporter - 🏆 35. / 51 Read more »